Publications
Research papers and publications
Research on gender inequality, STEM and educational stratification, and work and labor markets.
* Corresponding author.
Gender, STEM, and Educational Stratification
-
Mingming Li* and Wilfred Uunk. “Economic Opportunity and the Formation of Gendered STEM Aspirations: Security, Returns, and Accessibility.”
Research summary
A comparison of 61 countries and regions shows that greater economic security is associated with wider gender gaps in aspirations for mathematics-related work. Higher relative STEM pay and greater women’s representation in STEM occupations are associated with narrower gaps. Similar gaps can nevertheless arise from different patterns among girls and boys. Distinguishing security, returns, and access as separate dimensions of economic opportunity offers a more precise account of how national contexts relate to gendered aspirations.
-
Mingming Li* and Wilfred Uunk. “Gendered Entry, Convergent Exit: Socialization, Labor Market Signals and STEM Educational Trajectories.”
Research summary
Following German students over time, this study finds that occupational interests account for much of the gender gap in STEM entry. Once students enter STEM, higher earnings premiums are associated with less switching out, whereas longer working hours relative to other occupations are associated with more switching out. These later patterns are similar for women and men. The findings connect cultural and economic explanations of educational inequality by showing why entry and persistence require different accounts.
-
Mingming Li*. “Macro-context associations with gender gaps in mathematics-related occupational aspirations vary by construct and geographic scale.”
Research summary
TIMSS data on more than 750,000 adolescents show that the gender-equality paradox depends on how national context and aspiration gaps are measured. Greater affluence is associated with wider gaps in mathematics-related occupational aspirations, while gender-equality measures show different patterns across constructs and geographic comparisons. Separating girls’ and boys’ aspirations also reveals that similar gaps can conceal substantial differences in both groups’ aspiration levels. The study clarifies why explanations of gendered aspirations need to distinguish economic resources, institutions, and social norms, and to consider both aspiration levels and the gap between them.
-
Mingming Li*. “Does Affluence Widen the Gender Gap in STEM Choices? Micro-Level Evidence from Germany.”
Research summary
Among students entering higher education in Germany, women from higher-income families are less likely to choose STEM, and the gender gap is wider at higher income levels. This pattern persists after accounting for vocational interests, gender-role attitudes, and job values, while comparable gender differences are not clearly established for wealth. By distinguishing household income from accumulated assets, the study shows how family economic advantage can accompany greater gender segregation in educational specialization.
-
Wilfred Uunk and Mingming Li*. 2026. “Does Societal Affluence Increase the Gender Gap in STEM Graduation? A Longitudinal Assessment.”
Research summary
Following STEM graduation patterns in 113 countries from 1999 to 2023, this study finds that rising societal affluence is associated with a wider gender gap. The widening is linked to higher STEM graduation odds among men and varies across fields of study. The study advances the debate on the affluence paradox by tracing change within countries and identifying the gender-specific patterns that aggregate gaps can conceal.
-
Mingming Li* and Wilfred Uunk. “Matching, Mismatch, and Exit: Gendered Realization of STEM Credentials in Urban China.”
Research summary
Among urban STEM graduates in China, women and men appear equally likely to hold jobs matching their degrees when fields are pooled. Within broad fields, employed women are about nine percentage points less likely to have a match; women’s concentration in medicine masks this disadvantage in aggregate comparisons. Women are also more often outside paid work as homemakers, particularly when they have young children. The study shows how inequality in the use of STEM credentials can be overlooked unless field composition and care-related non-employment are examined.
-
Mingming Li* and Wilfred Uunk. “Assets beyond Housing and Gendered Entry into Science and Engineering among Homeowning Families in China.”
Research summary
Among Chinese homeowning families, women whose households hold liquid financial or productive assets beyond the home are more likely to enter science and engineering. The adjusted difference is about 13 percentage points, while the association among men is small and imprecisely estimated. This gender contrast persists after accounting for income and net wealth. The findings are consistent with resources supporting women’s entry into male-dominated fields and show why asset composition matters for understanding gendered educational opportunity.
-
Mingming Li and Maria Charles*. “From Housing Institutions to Gendered Fields of Study: The Educational Conversion of Institutional Advantage in Marketizing China.”
Research summary
Using Chinese family panel data, this study links historical housing institutions to gendered engineering choices. Greater exposure to housing appreciation, measured through cities’ earlier state-sector housing investment, is associated with a wider male–female gap in engineering entry. This association is stronger in families with more traditional gender norms. The findings connect market transition to educational stratification, showing how advantages rooted in public housing can remain relevant to gendered specialization across generations.
-
Mingming Li, Wilfred Uunk*, and Pia Blossfeld. “More College–College Couples Without a Stronger College Boundary? Population Composition and Parental-Education Sorting in China.”
Research summary
Chinese census and family panel data reveal distinct changes in educational and family-origin matching between spouses. Among couples with wives aged 27–29, rising college attainment accounted for about 93% of the 1990–2010 increase in college–college unions, while the relative college boundary weakened. Family panel estimates also suggest increasing resemblance in spouses’ parental education, with the strength of this trend varying across specifications. The study distinguishes changes in partner availability from educational and family-origin sorting, clarifying why more college–college couples need not signal stronger social closure.
-
Lukas Arnold, Lukas Engelberger, Jonas Kamp, Liron Kol, Laura-Sophia Koller, Mingming Li*, and Wilfred Uunk*. “Higher Education Lowers Science Skepticism, but Not When Status Is Inconsistent.”
Research summary
European Social Survey data from 29 countries show that higher education is associated with less suspicion that scientists manipulate or conceal evidence. Among men, this association is weaker at lower household incomes. The study links skepticism about scientific conduct to the economic circumstances accompanying educational credentials, showing how education’s association with public confidence in scientists varies across social positions.
-
Jiangbo Li, Jun Cheng*, and Mingming Li. 2026. “Educational Authority in Digitally Mediated Filipino Transnational Families: Smartphones, Parenting, and Children's Learning Across Households.”
-
Zheng Lu*, Wei Li, Mingming Li, and Yixuan Chen. 2019. “Destination China: International Students in Chengdu.”
Gender, Work, and Labor Markets
-
Xinyi Wei, Ru Jia, and Mingming Li*. “Platform Access and Conditional Occupational Membership among Women Ride-Hailing Drivers in China.”
Research summary
Interviews and follow-up accounts from women ride-hailing drivers in China show that platform access does not secure lasting recognition as a competent worker. Passengers repeatedly reopened judgments of competence, while ratings and complaint records extended these encounters beyond individual trips. Drivers’ growing confidence could coexist with reduced or ended participation as they navigated care, health, and earnings pressures. The study develops conditional occupational membership to show why access, recognition, and sustainable participation are distinct dimensions of inclusion.
-
Tianhe Chen and Mingming Li*. “Algorithmic Collaboration and Negotiated Dependence: Gendered Claim-Making and Platform Governance in China’s Ride-Hailing Sector.”
Research summary
Drawing on 21 interviews, this study shows how women ride-hailing drivers learn platform rules, share practical knowledge, and press for safer and fairer working conditions. Their accounts also reveal tensions in this reliance, as arrangements perceived as protective and metrics rewarding continuous availability could limit access to profitable work. The concept of algorithmic collaboration links everyday adaptation to demands for better governance, showing how worker agency develops within dependence on the platform.
-
Tianhe Chen and Mingming Li*. “Algorithmic Benevolent Sexism: Female Ride-Hailing Drivers and the Paradox of Protection in China.”
Research summary
Interviews with 21 women ride-hailing drivers in China reveal how protection can be experienced as both reassuring and restrictive. Drivers described passenger scrutiny that carried consequences through ratings and complaints, alongside safety arrangements they associated with fewer opportunities for profitable trips. The concept of algorithmic benevolent sexism captures this tension between protection and opportunity, extending research on sexism to workers’ experiences of opaque platform governance.
-
Mingming Li and Xinxin Ma*. “Flexible but Penalized? Gender Wage Gaps in China’s Informal Sector.”
Research summary
Among informal workers in China, gender wage inequality is greatest at the bottom of the earnings distribution. Accounting for selection into informal employment reveals larger gaps across most of the distribution, and differences in wage returns to observed characteristics account for most of the disparity. Gaps are also larger among married workers and parents. The study shifts attention from access to informal paid work to the wage structures and family circumstances associated with unequal rewards within it.
-
Mingming Li and Xinxin Ma*. “Employment Protection and Within-Couple Wage Inequality: Evidence from China.”
Research summary
Matched spousal data from China show that wives earn less when only husbands hold protected jobs than when both partners do. Couples with this arrangement also have the widest husband–wife wage gaps among the arrangements compared. Young children are associated with wives’ non-employment, highlighting an additional constraint on paid work. By treating employment protection as a couple-level arrangement, the study connects labor-market segmentation to the distribution of earnings and opportunities within households.
-
Jiachen Han, Mingming Li*, Shi Li, and Yingying Hu. 2024. “The widening gender wage gap in the gig economy in China: the impact of digitalisation.”
Research summary
Drawing on Chinese labor-force surveys from 2014 to 2018, this study finds a wider gender wage gap in gig work in more digitally developed settings. The gap is especially pronounced among older and married workers, and wage decomposition attributes most of it to differences in returns to observed characteristics. These findings challenge the expectation that digital expansion will automatically close pay gaps, directing attention to who gains from changing labor-market opportunities.
-
Mingming Li*, Xinyun Hu, Keyan Jin, and Jiachen Han. 2025. “Exploring factors influencing entry into the gig economy: A study of Chinese workers.”
Research summary
Using Chinese labor-force survey data, this study examines how earnings, flexibility, gender, and employment conditions relate to participation in gig work. Machine learning and regression identify wages and work flexibility as leading predictors, while women are less likely than men to participate. The findings place the economic attractions of gig work alongside unequal participation, bringing worker motivations and structural constraints into a common account of entry into flexible employment.
-
Mingming Li*, Yuan Tang, and Keyan Jin. 2024. “Labor market segmentation and the gender wage gap: Evidence from China.”
-
Mingming Li*, Xinyun Hu, and Keyan Jin. 2025. “The Return on Education and the Gender Wage Gap in China: A Sector Perspective.”
-
Mingming Li* and Fumei Zhang. 2023. “The wage structure and gap between public and private sectors: an empirical study in urban China.”
-
Mingming Li* and Jiayun Wang. 2021. “Influence of UTCP on the employment of female workers and the supply of labor force.”
-
Mingming Li*, Chunlu Tu, and Fumei Zhang. 2022. “Wage Gaps in Energy Industry: The Role of Sector.”
Other research
-
Mingming Li* and Xinxin Xu. 2022. “Fertility Intentions for a Second Child and Their Influencing Factors in Contemporary China.”
-
Nasi Wang and Mingming Li*. 2026. “Teachers’ perceptions of the risks and benefits of AI in higher education: A case study of ERNIE Bot.”
-
Xiaolong Shen, Jiangbo Li, Mingming Li, and Amir Karimi*. 2025. “A 29-Year (1994–2023) Bibliometrics Analysis of Usage of the Gamification in History Education.”
-
Mingming Li, Nuo Xu, and Yue Liang*. 2026. “Social Reality as a Phenomenological Construct: Understanding Intersubjectivity through the Lens of Shared Meaning.”
-
Fang Su, Mingming Li*, A. Shanthini, and R. Parthasarathy. 2021. “Systematic effective modeling and geospatial information framework for environmental issues in urban areas.”
-
Chengying Yang, Mingming Li*, and Dianyi Zhou. 2024. “Energy assessment in rural regions of China with various scenarios: Historical–to–futuristic.”
-
Mingming Li, Marko Milojevic, and Dmitry Gura*. 2024. “Development of methodology for evaluating sustainable rural development.”
-
Xinyun Hu, Yanling Jiang, Pengfei Guo*, and Mingming Li. 2024. “How does China's big data policy affect the digital economy of cities? Evidence from national big data comprehensive pilot zones.”
-
Pengfei Guo*, Xinyun Hu*, Shikuan Zhao, and Mingming Li. 2023. “The growth impact of infrastructure capital investment: the role of regional innovation capacity—evidence from China.”
-
Xinyun Hu and Mingming Li*. 2020. “Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? — Evidence from China.”
-
Zhigao Luo*, Xinyun Hu, Mingming Li, Jirui Yang, and Chuanhao Wen. 2019. “Centralization or Decentralization of Environmental Governance—Evidence from China.”
-
Mingming Li*, Eugeny Kolpak, Pavel Zhukov, Gurgen Gukasyan, and Patricio Federico Lewis Zuñiga. 2023. “China’s Current Energy Policy: Dependencies and Contradictions.”